Whenever it comes to testing software or code, there are multiple types of testing approaches available. Here will be going to discuss manual testing vs. automation testing, and you can quickly figure out which one is the best one to choose from.

Before starting a comparison between manual testing and automation testing, we will see what is manual testing and what is automation testing.

Manual testing:

So what is manual testing, when the testing methods of software code are executed manually by the QA analyst, it is termed manual testing. The main purpose of manual testing is to discover the bugs that may have been entered during software development. The test will test all the essential features which are a must to operate the software, and they will be available with an appropriate result whether they wish to go for some changes or not. Without the help of any of the automation software testing tools, a user will be able to generate the report.

Automation testing:

Now let’s see what is automation testing, whenever you wish to automate execution, automated software testing will be used. They will write code for test scripts that will help them to do testing easily. With these courts’ help, one will be able to figure out the validity of the software. Within no time, they will be executed, and they will be able to understand whether it is working properly. It clearly depends upon the pre-scripted test that will help them to compare actual results with the expected result so that in case of changes, they can easily do it.

Without the intervention of a manual tester, automated testing will allow the user to execute it fast and regression test without any hassle.

Manual testing Vs. Automation testing

Processing time:

In the automation testing process, the processing time is faster.

Manual testing consumes additional time than this one.

Exploratory testing

No random testing is allowed in automation

In Manual Testing, exploratory testing is possible

Initial investment:

In automation testing, the initial investment is required higher.

For manual testing, the initial investment is comparatively low.

Ideal approach:

Automation Testing can be used when one is looking forward to the execution time of test cases.

Manual testing is used to prove that test cases can be Run once or twice only.

Reliability:

Automation testing can be considered to be a reliable method because tools and scripts are used to perform it.

In Manual Testing, chances of human errors are there.

Investment:

Investment is required for automation engineers and testing tools in automation testing.

In Manual Testing, investment is needed for human resources.

Cost-effective:

Automation Testing is not effective for low-volume regression.

For high-volume regression, manual testing is not cost-effective.

Engagement:

In automation testing, a person will never get bored because they are using tools for results.

In Manual Testing, a person will face and get bored because of repeated manual test execution.

When to use:

Automated testing is best for performance testing, regression testing, load testing, and highly repeatable functional testing.

Manual testing is best for usability, ad hoc testing, and exploratory. If one wishes to make the changes using AUT, one can easily do it.

Conclusion:

This is all about Manual vs. automated testing. Now it depends upon the user which one to choose. As we have mentioned above, it depends upon the task for which are you looking forward to using the tools. 

It is suggested that in Manual Testing vs. automation testing, Automation Testing is quite fast if you wish to get available with immediate results in less time then this will help you to deal with it easily.

Why Choose Alakmalak?

Alakmalak is a Web and mobile App Development Company in India that offers services for several technologies. They have been around for a very long time and have developed over 3000+ projects for clients all around the world. They have a highly skilled development team with a great deal of experience.

• automated testing
• manual testing